Numerical simulation of helmet through interaction of 2D and 3D elements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46842/ipn.cien.v28n2a08Keywords:
numerical simulation, finite element method, structural dynamics, 3D elements, 2D elementsAbstract
Head injuries resulting from motorcycle accidents are a leading cause of severe mortality, with the most common injuries being traumatic brain injury, brain lesions, spinal cord injuries, facial injuries, and neck injuries. The helmet is a critical component for protecting the head during a motorcycle accident. A modern helmet typically features a rigid outer shell made from thermoplastic or fiberglass, designed to reduce the initial impact energy. 3D CAD modeling allows for the design of the helmet shell, creating a controlled discretization with hexahedral elements for 3D and quadratic elements for 2D to perform numerical simulations under the boundary conditions specified by the PROY-NOM-206-SCFI/SSA2-2016 standard. Each simulation is conducted with the same boundary conditions and mechanical properties for both the ABS helmet and the A36 steel block, with only the 2D and 3D elements of each piece (helmet and block) varying. The simulations, performed over 20 ms, provide unit deformations, stresses, and internal energy. The results show that, when using a rigid material, the computation time is similar regardless of the element type (2D or 3D). However, when 2D elements are used for deformable materials, the computation time is reduced by 88.4% compared to 3D elements. The observed variations mainly reflect differences in material rigidity and internal energy, due to the higher number of elements in the material thickness when using 3D elements. Nevertheless, the maximum stress and maximum unit deformation are the same, regardless of the element type used. The interaction between 2D and 3D elements does not result in significant variations, except in the iteration time, which increases by 0.05 ms. This is due to 2D elements, having fewer elements in the material thickness, requiring more time to generate interaction. However, this increase is insignificant.
References
J. Newman, “The biomechanics of head trauma and the development of the modern helmet. How far have we really come,” In Proceedings of the IRCOBI Conference, 2005, September 21-23, Prague, Czech Republic pp. 10. Available: https://wbldb.lievers.net/10041415.html
K. Kardamanidis, A. Martiniuk, R. Q. Ivers, M. R. Stevenson, K. Thistlethwaite, “Motorcycle rider training for the prevention of road traffic crashes”. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10, CD005240,2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005240.pub2
B. C. Liu, R. Ivers, R. Norton, S. Boufous, S. Blows, S. K. Lo, “Helmets for preventing injury in motorcycle riders”. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1, CD004333, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004333.pub3
M. Tabary, S. Ahmadi, M. H. Amirzade-Iranaq, M. Shojaei, M. S. Asl, Z. Ghodsi, V. Rahimi-Movaghar, “The effectiveness of different types of motorcycle helmets–A scoping review,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, 154, 106065, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106065
F. A. O. Fernandes, R. A. De Sousa, “Motorcycle helmets—A state of the art review,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 56, pp.1-21, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.03.011
W. Y. Yu, C. Y. Chen, W. T. Chiu, M. R. Lin, “Effectiveness of different types of motorcycle helmets and effects of their improper use on head injuries,” International journal of epidemiology, vol. 40, no.3, pp. 794-803, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr040
F. M. Shuaeib, A. M. S. Hamouda, M. M. Hamdan, Umar, R. R. Umar, M. S. J. Hashmi, “Motorcycle helmet: Part II. Materials and design issues,” Journal of materials processing technology, Vol.123, no. 3, pp. 422-431, 2002, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00047-X
A. L. Gutiérrez, “Las motos en México se multiplican por 4... y tus “antojos” serían la razón”. El Financiero. https://www.elfinanciero.com.mx/empresas/las-motos-en-mexico-se-multiplican-por-4-y-tus-antojos-serian-la-razon/ (accesed Oct. 22 , 2024).
P. K. Pinnoji, P. Mahajan, N. Bourdet, C. Deck, R. Willinger, “Impact dynamics of metal foam shells for motorcycle helmets: Experiments and numerical modeling,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol.37, no. 3, pp. 274-284, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.05.013
DOF - Diario Oficial de la Federación. “Gob.mx” https://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5524337&fecha=29/05/2018 (accesed Jun. 8, 2024).
R.C. Hibberler, Mecánica de materiales, 6th ed., Pearson Educación: Naucalpan de Juárez, México, pp. 894, 2006.
S. K. Totla, A. M. Pillai, M. Chetan, C. Warad, S. K. Vinodkumar, A. Y. Patil, B. B. Kotturshettar, “Analysis of helmet with coconut shell as the outer layer,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 32, pp. 365-373, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.047
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Iván Lenín Cruz Jaramillo, Martin Domínguez Sánchez, María del Carmen López Hernández, Víctor Manuel Ferreyra Coroy (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.