Comparative evaluation of DMST and LLFVW models for predicting the aerodynamic performance of vertical axis wind turbines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46842/ipn.cien.v30n1a02Keywords:
vertical axis wind turbine, wind energy, aerodynamic performance, DMST, LLFVWAbstract
Vertical axis wind turbines (VAWTs) require efficient aerodynamic models that can predict their performance at a low computational cost, especially in the preliminary stages of design and parametric analysis. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of two widely used simplified aerodynamic models: the Double Multiple Stream Tube (DMST) model and the Lift Line with Free Vortex Trail (LLFVW) model. Both approaches are applied to a small-scale Darrieus-H turbine and validated using experimental data reported in the literature. Two modeling configurations with different levels of physical complexity are analyzed, considering the influence of induction losses, wake expansion, and unsteady aerodynamic effects. The results show that the DMST model tends to overestimate the maximum power coefficient and shift the optimum operating point toward higher tip speed ratio (TSR) values, even when corrections for tip losses and variable induction factors are incorporated. In contrast, the LLFVW model more accurately reproduces wake dynamics and non-stationary effects, achieving better agreement with experimental data across the entire operating range. In particular, the LLFVW more accurately captures both the magnitude and position of peak performance, identifying itself as a more reliable model for the aerodynamic prediction of VAWTs.
References
[1] Consejo Nacional de Población (CONAPO), Indicadores demográficos de la República Mexicana, 2025, 2025. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://conapo.segob.gob.mx/work/models/CONAPO/pry23/PP/index.html
[2] A. V. Mendoza Ponce, R. O. Corona Núñez, L. Galicia Sarmiento, V. M. Garcı́a Guerrero, “Proyecciones poblacionales y económicas bajo diferentes escenarios para México,” Papeles Poblac., vol. 25, n.o 99, pp. 9-43, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.22185/24487147.2019.99.02
[3] L. Roy, K. Kincaid, R. Mahmud, D. W. MacPhee, “Double-Multiple Streamtube Analysis of a Flexible Vertical Axis Wind Turbine,” Fluids, vol. 6, n.o 3, p. 118, mar. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids6030118
[4] I. Paraschivoiu, “Double-multiple streamtube model for studying vertical-axis wind turbines,” J. Propuls. Power, vol. 4, n.o 4, pp. 370-377, 1988.
[5] D. De Tavernier, C. Ferreira, A. Goude, “Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine Aerodynamics”, en Handbook of Wind Energy Aerodynamics, B. Stoevesandt, G. Schepers, P. Fuglsang, y S. Yuping, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 1-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05455-7_64-2
[6] D. Marten, G. Pechlivanoglou, C. Navid Nayeri, C. Oliver Paschereit, “Nonlinear Lifting Line Theory Applied to Vertical Axis Wind Turbines: Development of a Practical Design Tool,” J. Fluids Eng., vol. 140, n.o 2, p. 021107, feb. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037978
[7] T. Sant, Improving BEM-based aerodynamic models in wind turbine design codes. Delft: DUWIND Delft University Wind Energy Research Institute, 2007.
[8] M. H. Hansen, M. Gaunaa, H. Aagaard Madsen, A Beddoes-Leishman type dynamic stall model in state-space and indicial formulations,Denmark. Forskningscenter Risoe. Risoe-R No. 1354, 2004. Disponible en: https://findit.dtu.dk/en/catalog/537f0cea7401dbcc12006a16
[9] QBlade Documentation, “OYE model”, QBlade, 2026. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://docs.qblade.org/src/theory/aerodynamics/dynamic_stall/OYE_stall.html#id1
[10] G. Bangga, S. Parkinson, W. Collier, “Development and Validation of the IAG Dynamic Stall Model in State-Space Representation for Wind Turbine Airfoils,” Energies, vol. 16, n.o 10, p. 3994, may 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16103994
[11] G. Bangga, T. Lutz, y M. Arnold, “An improved second-order dynamic stall model for wind turbine airfoils,” Wind Energy Sci., vol. 5, n.o 3, pp. 1037-1058, ago. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1037-2020
[12] L. Battisti et al., “Experimental benchmark data for H-shaped and troposkien VAWT architectures,” Renew. Energy, vol. 125, pp. 425-444, sep. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.098
[13] S. Shubham, K. Naik, S. Sachar, A. Ianakiev, “Performance analysis of low Reynolds number vertical axis wind turbines using low-fidelity and mid-fidelity methods and wind conditions in the city of Nottingham,” Energy, vol. 279, p. 127904, sep. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127904
[14] O. Eboibi, L. A. M. Danao, R. J. Howell, “Experimental investigation of the influence of solidity on the performance and flow field aerodynamics of vertical axis wind turbines at low Reynolds numbers,” Renew. Energy, vol. 92, pp. 474-483, jul. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.02.028
[15] B. Montgomerie, Methods for root effects, tip effects and extending the angle of attack range to ±180° for a blade element momentum calculation code, Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI), Division of Aeronautics, FFA, Stockholm, Sweden, Technical Report FOI-R–1305–SE, jun. 2004. [En línea]. Disponible en: http://www.vindenergi.org/AEROBIG/FOI-R--1305--SE.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Raúl Alberto Bernal Orozco, Oliver Marcel Huerta Chávez, Daniel Enrique Constantino Recillas (Autor/a)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.