Implementation of the risk triad algorithm to determine the probability of failure in pipelines: case of external corrosion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46842/ipn.cien.v26n1a02Keywords:
pipeline risk analysis, probability of failure, external corrosionAbstract
This paper describes and discusses a case of application in the hydrocarbon transportation industry of the so-called risk triad probabilistic model discussed by Kent Muhlbauer (or Quantitative Risk Reference Model algorithm), to establish the probability of failure (PoF) of a pipeline event, in particular the external corrosion threat. The model uses probabilistic mathematics to combine the variables and capture both individual impacts and the accumulation of minor effects through OR and AND logic gates. The use of these logic gates in risk models represents a distinct improvement over older methods, as it provides a better representation of how the parameters that materialize a threat behave. In this model, the variables affecting the PoF are grouped in three groups or elements, exposure, mitigation and resistance, which are a function of the threat or potential damage mechanism to which the asset under study is subject. After obtaining the PoF value, it is contrasted with the numerical values associated with the probability of failure in Table 4.2 of API RP 581, it is crossed with the CoF results and thus a risk ranking is obtained that allows optimizing resources by applying them to the highest risk assets. The results are presented after applying them to the external corrosion threat.
References
Department of Transportation, U.S. Government Printing Office, 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 195, Washington DC, 2011.
Oil & Gas Pipeline Systems, CSA Z662, 2019.
Risk Based Inspection Methodology, API Recommended Practice 581, 2020.
Gestión de integridad de sistemas de tubería para transporte de líquidos peligrosos, Norma Técnica Colombiana NTC 5901, 2012.
Managing System Integrity for Hazardous Liquid Pipelines, API Recommended Practice 1160, 2019.
Managing System Integrity of Gas Pipelines, ASME B31.8S, 2018.
W. K. Muhlbauer, Pipeline risk assessment: The Definitive Approach and Its Role in Risk Management. Houston: Clarion Technical Publishers, 2015.
E. Hendren, S. Gosse, K. Muhlbauer, L3 - Quantitative Risk Reference Model For Pipelines, Littleton: American Innovation, 2008.
W. K. Muhlbauer, D. Johnson, E. Hendren, S. Gosse, “A L3 Gas Reference Modeleration of Pipeline Risk Algorithms IPC06-10178,” in Proceedings of International Pipeline Conference, 25-29 September 2006, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
W. K. Muhlbauer. Pipeline risk management manual: ideas, techniques, and resources, third edition. Burlington, MA, USA: Elsevier, 2004.
B. Illowsky, S. Dean, Introductory Statistics. OpenStax - Rice University, 2018.
D. Calar, K. Goebel, P. Sandborn, U. Kumar. Prognostics and Remaining Useful Life (RUL) Estimation: Predicting with Confidence. Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press, 2021.
C. M. Tan, T. N. Goh – Editors, Theory and Practice of Quality and Reliability Engineering in Asia Industry, Springer Nature, 2017.
European Gas Pipeline Incident Data Group, “Gas Pipeline Incidents,” in 11th EGIG-report 1970-2019, Doc. number VA 20.0432, 2021.
Environmental Science for European Refining, “Performance of European cross-country oil pipelines, Statistical summary of reported spillages in 2019 and since 1971,” Report No. 4/21, CONCAWE, Brussels, 2021.
National Association of Corrosion Engineers, Robert Baboian, R. S. Treseder, NACE Corrosion Engineer`s Reference Book. Third Edition, Houston: NACE International, 2002.
Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes Part 3: Chemical and electro-chemical test, BS 1377-3, 2018.
R. L. Starkey, K. M. Wight, “Anaerobic Corrosion of Iron in Soil,” Soil Science, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 341, Oct. 1946.
H. M. Herro, "MIC Myths - Does Pitting Cause MIC," presented at the CORROSION 98, San Diego, California, Mar. 1998.
J. Álvarez, E. Ruggiero, A. Rodríguez, “Definición de un criterio para la priorización de indicaciones CIPS-DCVG en el marco de la implementación de un proceso ECDA,” presentado en el 2º Congreso de Integridad en instalaciones en el Upstream y Downstream de Petróleo y Gas, Perú, 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Instituto Politecnico Nacional
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.